SEL35F18 vs SEL24F18Z

Before the E-mount Zeiss Touit 32 mm, people always asked about whether to choose the Sony SEL35F18 or the SEL24F18Z. Why? It’s because these were the only two lenses available for the E-mount NEX which are not too wide or too narrow for the angle of view, and the main concern is their price difference which is almost 2.5 times (SGD 629 for the SEL35F18 and SGD1,699 for the SEL24F18Z). I believe if the price difference is lesser then most of us will definitely go for the Zeiss.

SEL24F18 (Left) and SEL35F18 (Right)
SEL24F18 (Left) and SEL35F18 (Right)

However, we cannot do anything to their prices. Many websites have the individual review for each of them but not the comparison between both of them. So I decided to do a simple comparison for both of them here since I have the chance to test out both lenses.  I hope that this post can help those who are frustrated/annoyed/hesitated about which lens is the one for you, and anyone who owns any of these lenses are welcome to leave your comment too here to help out those potential owner.

Below is the technical specification comparison.

SEL24F18Z

SEL35F18

35mm equivalent focal-length

36mm

52.5mm

Lens groups / elements

7 / 8 (2 aspherical, 1 ED)

6 / 8 (2 aspherical, 1 ED)

Angle of view (on APS-C)

61°

44°

 

Minimum aperture (F)

22

22

Number of aperture blade

7

7

Circular aperture

Yes

Yes

Minimum focus distance

0.16m

0.3m

Maximum magnification ratio

0.25x

0.15x

 

 

Filter diameter

49mm

49mm

Dimensions (Diameter x Length)

63 x 65.5mm

63 x 45mm

Weight (approx.)

225g

154g

OSS

No

Yes

Price

SGD 1,699

SGD 629

Look and Feel

Although the SEL35F18 has a longer focal length than the SEL24F18Z but it has a relatively smaller and compact size than the SEL24F18Z. It is also lighter in the weight.

SEL24F18 (Left) and SEL35F18 (Right)
SEL24F18 (Left) and SEL35F18 (Right)

Both of them have the same designed shape of lens hood. The SEL24F18Z’s lens hood is thicker and taller than the SEl35F18’s. It made the SEL24F18Z looked even larger and longer than the SEL35F18.

SEL24F18 (Left) and SEL35F18 (Right)
SEL24F18 (Left) and SEL35F18 (Right)

The SEL24F18Z comes with a matte black surface while the SEL35F18 has a more “shinny” black surface.When you hold them in your hands, the SEL24F18Z has a premium rock solid metal feel while the SEL35F18 gives you a solid but plasticy feel.

SEL24F18 (Left) and SEL35F18 (Right)
SEL24F18 (Left) and SEL35F18 (Right)

Despite of that, the little blue Zeiss logo on the SEL24F18Z makes itself not only feel but also look more premium.

Little Blue Zeiss on SEL24F18Z
Little Blue Zeiss on SEL24F18Z

The SEL35F18 wins in the more compact size and lighter in weight while the SEL24F18Z has a more premium look and feel.

Winner: Tight

Difference of the Focal Length

The SEL24F18Z and the SEL3518 are two different focal length lenses. From the same distance, the SEL24F18Z is able to capture more things into the frame while the SEL35F18 can capture a closer look of the subject. The shots below are captured by the SEL35F18 and the SEL24F18Z while the camera was mounted on the tripod, placed at the same spot, and shot in same settings.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

When I was shooting with SEL35F18, I found that I was always in an awkward or even impossible situation for me to move backward or away from my subject. However, it is always easier for me to move closer to my subject when shooting with the SEL24F18Z. I won’t announce the SEL24F18Z as a winner here because it is all up to your shooting styles and preference.

Winner: Tight

Sharpness Performance

I framed the subject with a same composition instead of shooting at the same spot so that we can have a fair comparison for the center and the corner sharpness performance.

Sharpness Cropped Area
Sharpness Cropped Area

Center Sharpness

The SEL24F18Z shines here. It outperformed the SEL35F18 from the wide open till the end and its sharpness is 1 stop better than the SEL35F18’s sharpness. The SEL24F18Z boosts up its sharpness from the F 2.8 which is as sharp or not better than the SEL35F18’s F 4 sharpness.

Center Sharpness
Center Sharpness Comparison

Corner Sharpness

The SEL24F18Z’s corner sharpness performed slightly better than the SEL35F18 but not as significant as its center sharpness. As a wide angle lens, the corner of the SEL24F18Z does have some shape changed compare to the normal corner view of the SEL35F18.

Corner Sharpness
Corner Sharpness Comparison

Winner: SEL24F18Z

CA Performance

The CA comparison also used the same shots as above but cropped from a slightly off center and the top right corner.

CA Cropped Area
CA Cropped Area

Center CA

Both lenses have a purple fringing at the center area at theirs wide opens. Stopped down to F 2 will remove the purple fringing and it does not appear anymore.

Center CA Comparison
Center CA Comparison

Corner CA

The SEL24F18Z tends to have magenta fringing while the SEL35F18 has purple fringing at their corner shots. There are still having some minor fringing at the F 5.6 for both lenses but they disappeared when stopped down to F 8.

Corner CA Comparison
Corner CA Comparison

Both lenses have good CA control in their center area while having some issue when handling the CA in their corner area. It is glad to see that the cheaper SEL35F18 has a similar CA control as the much expensive SEL24F18Z or sad to say that the quality of the corner CA control of SEL24F18Z does not match its crazy price.

Winner: Tight

Macro Performance

The SEL24F18Z has a shorter minimum focus distance of 16cm and larger magnification ratio of 0.25 times compare to the SEL35F18 30cm minimum focus distance and 0.15 times of magnification ratio. How do these figures differ in the real life shooting?

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The NEX-6 was mounted on the tripod and being set to manual focus. From the images as shown above, the different of minimum focus distance is significant. You should be aware of this if you like to shoot close-up shots.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Besides, the magnification ratio also play an important role in the close-up shot. You can see how much difference of the close up subject look between both of the lenses.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Both lenses have a pretty good sharpness for macro shots. But the SEL24F18Z’s larger maximum magnification ratio gives you a larger view of subject so that you don’t need to take the risk to zoom your subject and lost its sharpness.

Winner: SEL24F18Z

Vignetting

Both lenses exhibit heavy vignetting at their wide open at F 1.8 and F 2. Stopped down to F 2.8 will significantly reduce the vignetting.

Vignetting Comparison
Vignetting Comparison

Winner: Tight

Bokeh Performance

Usually the longer focal length is easier to produce better bokeh effect. This applied to the SEL35F18 as well. Personally, I prefer the smoother and more creamy bokeh effect produced by the SEL35F18 than the SEL24F18Z. You can feel the difference of producing the bokeh effect immediately when you are trying both lenses together.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Both of them are able to produce beautiful circular bokeh effect even at F 2.8 (they started to show some polygon shape too). The polygon shape of bokeh become more obvious afterwards.

Bokeh Comparison
Bokeh Comparison

Winner: SEL35F18

Ghosting and Flare

The spotlight was used to test the ghosting control here. 100% crops by different lenses were cropped from the shots below accordingly.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Ghosting Comparison
Ghosting Comparison

Both lenses have very good control for the ghosting and flare across the frame. However the SEL35F18 has some noticeable light blobs near the light source from F 4 onward while the SEL24F18Z has none of these.

Winner: SEL24F18Z

Handheld Low Light Shooting

Theoretically the SEL35F18 needs a minimum of 1/50 second of safe shutter speed while the SEL24F18Z needs 1/40 second. However, the SEL35F18 comes with the Sony OSS image stabilizer which enable you to have a 3 – 4 stops slower of safe shutter speed. So will it outperforms the SEL24F18Z here?

Handheld Comparison
Handheld Comparison

By turn the OSS on, the SEL35F18 had the clear and sharp shots from its safe shutter speed 1/50 second to the 1/8 second. In the other hand, the blurriness start to appear on the shots of SEL24F18Z when the shutter speed fall below the safe shutter speed of 1/40 second. The shot by SEL24F18Z is still usable at 1/20 or even at the 1/10 second which is quite good for a lens without image stabilizer.

I did not perform the video recording comparison but an image stabilizer always is an advantage for the video recording. By having a solid OSS image stabilizer, the winner for handheld low light shooting is definitely belongs to..

Winner: SEL35F18

Colour Reproduction

Both of the lenses produce an accurate and saturate colour. The shots were captured from the same spot.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

By the 100% crops comparison above, the SEL24F18Z shows that it has a deeper and more saturated colour than the SEl35F18 but they are insignificant and close to each other.

Winner: Tight

Bottom Line

The SEL35F18 and the SEL24F18Z are definitely two of the best E-mount lenses. At the price of SGD 629, it is pleased to see that the SEL35F18 has a close performance with its more expensive brother SEL24F18Z which cost you SGD 1,699. Besides, it also has an effective built-in OSS where the SEL24F18Z does not own. If you are going to buy one of the lens after reading this review, please remember the following two points:

Firstly, test out both of them yourself if possible. Compare and find out which focal length suit your shooting style better. If you prefer to shoot landscape, shooting at some space limited place like restaurant, party, and etc, go ahead for the SEL24F18Z. If you do the video recording frequently, do not want to have any shape changed for your subject, like the smoother and more creamy bokeh, then go and grab the SEL35F18.

Secondly, forget about the sharpness, CA and etc performance difference and then go back to the first point. Both of them are sharp lenses and have close performance in other fields. Unless you are able to get the SEL2418Z with a cheaper price, otherwise the performance difference between these two lenses are really not enough to justify the difference of their prices.

Before the end of the post today, I would like to share some shots which taken by both of the lenses and hope you like them =)

SEL24F18Z

The Merlion
The Merlion
Sunset
Sunset
The One
The One
Morning in the Grass
Morning in the Grass
Vitality
Vitality

SEL35F18

The Night Rider
The Night Rider
The Boat
Fun
Need for Speed
Need for Speed
Tai He Dian - Lego Version
Tai He Dian – Lego Version
Work, work!
Work, work!

If you want to read more about the SEL35F18 and SEL24F18Z  or view more shots taken by these lenses, you may read the individual lens review at SEL35F18 review and SEL24F18Z review.

This is the end of the comparison between the SEL24F18Z and the SEL35F18. Hopefully it can give a little help to clear your doubt for theses two lenses. If you have question about any of them, or you are the owner of any of them and would like to share your opinion, you are welcome to leave your comment here. Thanks for your reading, hope you enjoyed it and like it =)

Follow me on:

fb_icon_325x325      

Contact me by email: jamesphotography2013@gmail.com

*** Need Your Support ***

Dear Readers,

I’m appreciated for your visit and reading at this website. It is great that to show your kindness and support to this website by purchasing some HD wallpapers or print out at my 500px page. Your support will be used to cover the web hosting fee, transportation, and miscellaneous fee.

You may contact me by leaving your comment here or via email if you would like to purchase any of my hard work that is not available in 500px.com. Let’s keep this website alive, more FREE lens/camera reviews and photography tips are coming on their way!

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “SEL35F18 vs SEL24F18Z

  1. Thanks for an excellent comparison, I especially liked the photos that switched between the two lenses. I agree with your concluding point that a person’s preferred shooting style is what should ultimately decide which lens to choose.

    I bought the 35mm initially because it was the most versatile focal length “in theory”, but in practice I found I always felt it was too zoomed in and I was always always trying to move backwards to fit in what I was shooting. This is because I chose the lens for its wide aperture so I could use it in low light like parties, indoors etc, but these scenarios require a wider FOV than the 35mm provides, so I have swapped to the 24mm which should arrive soon. Can’t wait to try it out!

    Like

    1. Yea, the sel24f18z is an amazing and excellent lens, hopefully it will fit your shooting style and you are enjoyed using it! Share with us about your opinion/impression when you get your sel24f18z, cheers.

      Like

    1. Hi val, I don’t have the Touit 32 long enough to make a formal comparison. However, my 15 mins of first impression about the Touit 32 is the color richness and image sharpness is on par with the Zeiss 24, but the Touit 32 does not use ultrasonic auto-focus motor as the Zeiss 24, so it is more noisy and noticeable when it is doing the auto-focusing. Hope these info give you some help.

      Like

  2. Thank you for the wonderful and detailed comparison. Personally, I am using the 24mm and while I sometimes wish that it would be smaller, I am very pleased with the results. 50mm equiv. is not versatile enough for me; I feel better about cropping an image then about missing to many indoor or landscape shots. 35mm equiv. is the better compromise for an all-purpose walk-around lens. (For portraits, a use an old manual lens with larger aperture and focal length anyway.)

    I also enjoy the short minimum focus distance of the 24mm; you get some very cool effects when going close to baby faces etc.

    I am sure that the 35mm is the perfect lens if the standard focal length is what you seek. I would feel like Charlie Pinker, though. The 24mm is the best that the Nex system can offer me.

    Like

    1. Thanks Joscha Bach and sorry for my late reply. You are right, the 24mm is the best in the NEX system and it is the most expensive prime as well (more expensive than the E-mount full frame Zeiss). I love the 24mm very much and I always missed it when I switched to other lenses. It’s great that you like the 24 mm as well. Cheers!

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s